Transcripts-Bannon’s War Room: Episode 1820 Dr. Wolf COVID Vaccines and Pregnancy. April 29, 2022.
Pfizer Documents: Dr. Naomi Wolf. April 29, 2022.
Transcripts from Bannon’s War Room on Rumble: Pregnant women excluded from Covid-19 Vaccine trials before proven safe and effective.
Published April 29, 2022.
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
Of all the things. I've reported that the volunteers have found. What I'm about to share is probably the most disturbing and the most important. Basically, this report written by a female physician analyzing the documents shows that pregnant women were excluded from the trials before they concluded it was safe and effective. They concluded it was safe and effective based on mice and the autopsies of mice fetuses, and that horrifically the Department of Defense data shows that female soldiers’ pregnancies are experiencing an absolutely catastrophic rate of abnormalities and fetal problems. So, it's so important. I'm just going to read it. It's super-fast.
She says to date, there have not been any human clinical trials ( this is really real, what you're hearing), conducted by COVID-19 vaccine pharmaceutical company to determine if vaccines are safe during pregnancy or while breastfeeding. All emergencies authorizations exclude pregnant women and no COVID-19 vaccine has been approved for use during pregnancy. Astonishingly, however, she says many professional organizations have strongly advocated despite that pregnant women get this vaccine despite any lack of safety data.
And what she points out is thanks to the court-ordered release of the confidential Pfizer documents which the FDA wanted sealed for 75 years, we have learned that pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers were excluded from Phase 1, 2, and 3 of the human trials. One recently released by Pfizer document list 21 groups of people who are excluded from all phases of the Pfizer trials and specifically singles out quote, “women who are pregnant and breastfeeding as not able to participate in any of the trials”. And she gives it's citation. Despite this the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology is Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine. All of these Obstetrics and Gynecological organizations were strong advocates for vaccinating pregnant and lactating women. And even though none were approved. How she asked could they possibly be promoting an experimental untested vaccine for pregnant women?
As it turns out their clinical recommendations are based on a faulty study conducted on a few dozen rats in France before any research trials can be performed on human pregnant women and new drug must first be tested on pregnant animals. These are called developmental and reproductive toxicity or DART studies. They state that the DART studies for the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine have been reported in Europe and according to these animal studies they don't indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy embryo, fetal development or postnatal development. However, what was that based on?
Given the extreme importance one would expect to study to be conducted by independent researchers using a robust design but she reviewed the study and she writes this is a doctor, she writes, “It is astounding to discover that what was performed in a mere 44 rats and for a length of only 42 days”. Then she gives the citation. To their credit, it turns out that rats are the perfect mammal to do pregnancy studies on because they only need 21 days conception from conception to delivery. So, in the study half of the rat pregnancies were terminated at day 21 by C-section and the fetuses were removed from the mother and studied.
The other half were determined allowed to give birth and then they terminated the study, that's it. And she points out, this is long before developmental issues could have been observed in the offspring and precludes any long-term safety or fertility studies. This 42-day study on 44 pregnant rats, led them to conclude that there were quote, “no effects on female fertility” but she points out there were two glaring problems with this study. It does not require the fulfilled requirements of the DART study to make sure that they're okay into the next generation.
So, there's no way to know if there were adverse effects on rats. And the other huge glaring study is a disclaimer that I sent to your producer which should shock you. She says there's no way these investigators could be unbiased why?
They were employed by and held stock in either by Pfizer or BioNTech. I'm going to say this again. The doctors who concluded based on 44 French rats that the vaccine was safe for pregnant women were employed by Pfizer or owned BioNTech and Pfizer stock. They tried to hide this by using only initials, instead of full names. In spite of that, pregnant women were encouraged to get vaccinated.
So, looking at the actual VAERS Adverse Event reports what you see is that this had horrific outcomes. This section covering pregnancy and lactation on pages 12 to 13 reveals that only, that 20% of the 413 reported cases of Adverse Events for pregnant women were quote, “serious. These include twenty-five miscarriages five, fetal deaths, as well as uterine contractions during pregnancy, preterm deliveries, premature rupture of membranes and fetal growth restriction meaning the babies could not develop fully.
Also included were serious and less serious adverse side effects of breastfed babies that included infantile vomiting, fever, rash, agitation and allergy to the vaccine. Six women having Adverse Events who got the vaccine while breastfeeding included partial paralysis, suppressed lactation, breast pain, migraines and breast milk discoloration. And Pfizer's response to the above alarming data in the secret documents was there were no safety signals that emerged from the review of these cases of use in pregnancy and while breastfeeding.
The last thing I'm going to say in this shocking shocking report is that this doctor also looked right there at the Department of Defense data, which has been exposed by three whistleblowers represented by attorney Tom Renz. And what they're showing again, I keep raising the question of is this a national security breach? Is this a national security breach because we don't know the level of micrograms that were given to female pregnant soldiers in our military or to any of the soldiers in our military or sailors or air force members, and that we've shown makes a difference because when you get up to 100 micrograms, people get very very sick. So, in this database they observed disturbing evidence of dramatic increases in serious medical conditions among military personnel in 2021 and among these are congenital malformations of fetuses.
The rising congenital malformations increased dramatically from a baseline rate of ten thousand nine hundred and six cases per year to in 2021 when female soldiers were being and sailors and pilots were being forced to take this experimental vaccine, it rose to 18,951 congenital malformations for even part of the year of 2021, for part of the year of 2021. It nearly doubled.
The fetuses of our brave women solder, sailors, air force members who were pregnant who submitted to what our president said they had to do as the commander-in-chief took this experimental vaccine, their babies suffered, their babies suffered. And this is a criminal attack on our military, on our brave women and men in our military. The NIH concludes that it's safe and effective in spite of these numbers for pregnant women. And she makes a final point that all of the spokes models use the phrase, “the data suggests it's safe and effective”. And she points out that the word suggests is one of those weasel words that really represents the lowest level of certainty. Quote-unquote “expert opinion”. She concludes, the evidence is clear that the potential risks of pregnant women getting vaccinated with the new mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, far outweigh the benefits.
This is one of the worst things I've ever seen in my 35 years as a reporter. This is an attack on American women. It's an attack on pregnant women intentionally or not intentionally. The fact that Pfizer saw these data, the American College Gynecologist in Obstetrics Organizations knew of this data, the FDA knew of this data, that 44 French rats were autopsied and their fetuses are fine so, go ahead and get injected pregnant woman who trusts me.
This is a crime that every single mother, grandmother, husband who cares about women of childbearing age should be horrified and appalled by it. It is a major criminal act and I really have to ask knowing about this data and letting female soldiers take this vaccine and jeopardize the health and offspring of their children, which is going to tie up or hamper our fighting capacity, right? If you're dealing with it a congenitally abnormal baby and child, what is that going to do to our military preparedness? These are massive crimes.
Steve Bannon:
What is so shocking is that it appears at least from the evidence that you've put forward and this doctor put forward that it's an institutional problem because you have correct me if I'm wrong. And like I say this ain't my line of country. You have all of the major institutions that pregnant women would look to for their safety and security and health well-being, do you not, supporting the vaccines? I’m a right? Did I hear that wrong or is that not correct?
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
No, you're exactly, right. And that's why people who understand how the chain of command works for this decision-making, need to step back and look at this edifice of criminality because the decisions do flow.
These documents went right to the FDA. So, you're 12 members of Congress who demanded the FDA reveal their side of this communication. They're doing the right thing and I'm now calling on other members of Congress. Please step-up, subpoena these records. We need you. We need a multi-pronged approach, but the FDA couldn't approve this without the sanction and okay of the White House because surely if you can imagine if you’re the head of the FDA, you look at this data, well, if this ever comes to light of day that we've okayed the injection of every pregnant woman in America based on a conflicted study of 44 French rats, and 42 days of pregnancy, and the people who did the study are employees of the drug manufacturers, or own shares and are going to get rich when this is rolled out to pregnant women, this is going to blow up the White House. We can't do it. We can't. Okay. It we have to tell Pfizer, it's not okay, but all the way down the line and to this very day, the checks and balances were withdrawn and withheld.
And that's why I need to tell you all when we have time about new information about the origin of the vaccine because the Chinese Communist Party engagement starts right from the very beginning. And so, we need to have investigations, not just by Attorney Generals. Not just by civil actions by lawyers. We need members of Congress to start investigating. We need the White House to stop everything, pull the plug on the roll out and start investigating or they should be impeached and investigated and convicted for massive harms to the babies.
I mean, I just told you about 8,000 pregnancies that have congenital malformations that they found in our fighting women, women who stepped up and joined the military to protect our country who put themselves, who are willing to go to conflict areas and put themselves in harm's way and leave their families for us and we hurt their babies.
This happened, eight thousand babies were harmed out of the norm of the ordinary baseline of what you're going to see for congenital malformations. Someone has to go to prison. Someone has to face long jail terms. If not worse. This is an act of treason.
END
(Note to readers: I am not affiliated with Bannon’s War Room. I am merely transcribing so that people could copy and share.)