Transcripts- Bannon’s War Room Episode 1832 Dr. Naomi Wolf, ‘The Lies of Pfizer’ May 04, 2022
Pfizer Documents. Dr. Naomi Wolf. May 04, 2022. Location19:15
Transcripts from Bannon’s War Room on Rumble: The Lies of Pfizer
Published on May 04, 2022.
Steve Bannon:
We’re literally dead broke and they’re asking for $33 billion to send to Ukraine. A border conflict on the Russians speaking easter border of Ukraine, with no money talking about the border. Nobody going to the border, Pelosi not going to the border so in the middle of all of this we told you, an economic crisis that has triggered a capital market and financial crisis. And we got one now ladies and gentlemen. And the inflation the seven to eight nine percent is just the tip of it. And that's the one I know this all on top of everybody, but it's not about a soft landing anymore.
This is about a real crisis, want to go, but some companies are doing fine. Those companies would be the pharmaceutical companies. Why? Because they're basically taking your tax dollars and feeding them and then forcing you to buy their products. MSNBC every night. The commercials are all from the pharmaceutical companies. They are essentially, it's their like state TV for Big Pharma. That's what it is. It's like NPR or PBS for big Pharma.
Naomi Wolf you've been on this. You have an investigative team now, thousands of people, you have hundreds of lawyers on this. You're looking at Pfizer documents that were supposed to be sealed for 70 years and through divine providence, the grace of God, they're not. Can you walk us through what you're working on, the timeline and all of it ma’am?
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
Sure. I've two important things to share. One is a report from Cindy Weiss one of the volunteers that's asking what happened to 50 pregnant women and I'll give you a little background but before I jump into that, I just want to say, I think this investigation is really making a difference because Pfizer tried to release a lot of their data in this latest document dump for May in the form of unopenable files. So, we've got our tech people working on that. But, you know, you don't release things in a way that can't be read unless you really, really, really don't want them to be read but moving along.
Steve Bannon:
But hold on, couldn't we go back to the judge and say they're playing a game because we here's why Trump says, no games. We can't have these people. I know you got your tech people sure they’ll open it, but first off, the public should know this. We're not playing games with you, Big Pharma, Pfizer. You were ordered by a court to release the documents. You got to release the documents. Is there any way you can go to court and let the judge know the trying to be cute?
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
Yeah. So, we've tasked the lawyers with what we do about the fact that some of these documents, were released in this impenetrable way and I'll get back to you all with an answer. But that's the beauty of having 250 lawyers. I'll keep you posted. But yeah, like what's so lovely about this is that people can't be hoodwinked anymore. You can't kind of sneak the outcome in through the back door anymore. We're on it. And we've got eyes on it, expertise eyes. So, I do feel highly empowered by that.
But let me tell you about this report. Those of you who watched last week you'll remember and it's really making headlines as it should that the assurances that all the spokes models gave us that the vaccine was safe and effective for pregnant women and I'm specifically targeting you, Apoorva Mandavilli, of the New York Times, you claimed this over and over and I said, where's the data? Where's the data? And then you blocked me. But there was no study backing that up. And what we did find in the Pfizer documents to recap, was that the only study was one of 44 rats, 44 French rats who were followed for 21-42 days and then their fetuses were autopsied. The baby rats weren't allowed to be born to check if they were okay, as baby rats. And these 44 rats were the basis of telling human American women, “it's safe and effective”.
And if you go to the CDC website to this day, there's this horrible V Safe study, which is basically an experiment on pregnant women but that it's written so convolutedly that if you read it you would think, oh, it's safe and effective. I'm a pregnant woman, I should really get vaccinated. And the American College of Obstetricians and Surgeons, may they face divine judgment, told pregnant women over and over, harassed them to get vaccinated with this mRNA vaccine.
Well, the other outcome that I mentioned which is horrific, is that the women in the armed forces in 2021, after this forced mRNA injection got to get injected or you lose your career as a military woman, they experienced an 8,000 number rise in fetal malformations, above the baseline of every other year of about 10,000. So that's an eighty percent rise in fetal malformations among our military women. So as tragic as that is, it's really important to dig into what is the status of what was studied vis-à-vis pregnant women in the Pfizer documents.
So, this report the title is, ‘Missing 50 Pregnant Women, Have You Seen Them?’ And she points out that they wrongly enrolled pregnant women in an experiment that you're not supposed to enroll pregnant women in, in this way at this point. And then you can't find out what happened to them, even though they're supposed to follow them. And that sounds contradictory but listen.
So, in the first batch of Pfizer documents she was assigned to review document 5.36 which is accumulative analysis of post authorization adverse event reports, meaning bad things that happened after the mRNA vaccine was introduced to the American public. She noted that there were a significant number of Adverse Events, bad things reported in pregnant women. So, she paid close attention to documents related to vaccine effects on pregnancy in Pfizer documents. So, according to the Pfizer clinical protocol document, women who were pregnant or breastfeeding were to be excluded from the vaccine trials. So, really process this.
The spokes model said it's safe and effective, but the internal documents show that pregnant women are supposed to be dropped, left out, breastfeeding women are supposed to be dropped left out from these trials, meaning the injection see what happens to them. So, there's a stopping rule criteria, if you test positive for pregnancy, you're supposed to be withdrawn from the trial. Nonetheless, right, nonetheless, the clinical overview document below lists 50 women who were part of the clinical trials that reported pregnancies, but they weren't dropped. 16 of them withdrew from study due to pregnancy. That’s what was supposed to happen.
The wording is confusing, she says, but it appears that at least the remaining 34 women quote continued to be followed for pregnancy outcomes. It could also be construed to mean that all 50 continue to be followed. So even though they were supposed to exclude pregnant women because this was such a preliminary experiment it wasn’t ethical to inject pregnant women with it, they didn't exclude either 34 or 50 women. And indeed some of them were given BNT162b2, which is the fancy name for the mRNA injection and others were given a placebo. Then it says these participants continue to be followed for pregnancy outcomes. The report says, no births have been reported from individuals who become pregnant but none of them appear later on. They vanished. We don't know what happened to them.
Steve Bannon:
We're going take a short break. We'll ask the question now and get an answer, is this incompetence or malfeasance?
Short Break.
Naomi are all trials run this incompetently? This is what I don’t understand this or is it they just select the CCP trial because they're under time pressure because it seems like these Big Pharma companies are supposed to be so professional. It sounds like, I just can't get my arms around it. It sounds like totally confused. People are getting injected with the mRNA when they should be getting the placebo. Is this normal behavior, ma'am?
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
It's of course, it's not normal. I mean these are results that the people who ran them thought would never see the light of day. And just to finish telling you how shockingly just shocking this is in terms of them playing God with 50 pregnant women. According to their own clinical protocols document these women should have been followed for a minimum of six months from their last visit from the day they were withdrawn. And it says they followed them but and the clinical protocols for every Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 trial says you have to follow the subject for fewer than 24 months but no less than six months, right?
That's standard, gold standard for everyone but, our volunteers are geniuses. One of them created a font and search tool that searches all the release Pfizer documents and she searched for pregnant and pregnancy and found no updated information on these 50 women and their pregnancy outcomes. And she concludes as more information on the dangers to pregnant women from the mRNA vaccines surfaces some of which the manufacturers had at their disposal early on.
I feel it is imperative that we hear the stories of these 50 women and their babies. They vanished. They're gone, right? even though they were supposed to be followed for six months after they got pregnant after having been injected. Nope, gone nowhere to be seen and what that means is if God forbid, they have the kinds of outcomes that these poor female soldiers are having with fetal malformation, 80 percent rise in fetal malformation, right. Fortunately, Pfizer can't find them right? dog ate my homework. I don't know what happened to it. It's under the couch somewhere. I don't know what happened to the records of those 50 women. It's absolutely shocking. And I'll go further.
My guess as and now I’m speaking as a cultural critic is that these were voiceless women. My bet and I will bet you money that if we find out who these women were there going to be women who are in prison, or women who are in some kind of home, or women who don't have the rights that they would otherwise have or women who are just impoverished or in some kind of program, government program in which they are dependent on benefits, or dependent on the good graces of the government, for their food or for their child care.
These are not rich White women who were oops injected, oops given a placebo, oops, I don't know where your records went, with the harms, the level of harms that we're seeing with pregnant women being injected. And so, what I think this is, is medical experimentation, not of am Mengele level but of an early, you know, 1930-1933 Nazification of doctors’ level, where doctors were enlisted at the frontlines and scientists were listed as a front lines of Nazi ideology to just separate people into worthless and not worthless.
Steve Bannon:
But I thought we had, I'm not an expert but I thought after the war with the Nuremberg trials they also had a whole aspect of subsets of that about this whole thing of informed consent. And you had to actually understand what you were signing up for, the Nuremberg Code.
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
This is the right question to ask. And this is why I'm really asking people to understand that what I just read to you is a record of a very serious crime and it's not Naomi saying it's a crime. It's international law and domestic law saying it's a crime, you're talking about the Nuremberg Code and you're talking about the Geneva Conventions and you're talking about the Hippocratic Oath and one of our lawyers actually, George Smith, the first one to file with the Attorney General's office in Ohio, it's our second AG letter, he makes exactly that point. That, this is a violation of the Liberty Clause in violation of your due process.
You cannot have informed consent if you don't know what happened to these 50 pregnant women or if you don't know that if you bring your seventeen-year-old to get injected that it has a high likelihood above average of damaging his or her heart, or you don't know that 8,000 fetuses of pregnant soldiers are suffering malformation, eighty percent above the baseline. These are the hiding of these experiments and the experimenting on people, right.
These women were not told just like American people were not told, clearly you're part of an experiment and we're going to cut corners or you're part of an experiment with the rat trials. They didn't tell everyone that the people running it were conflicted, right? So, at every level, there's a denial of informed consent and that's coercion and it's more than coercion. It's fraud. It's battery. It's a lot of illegal things if you don't have informed consent and medical procedures are done to you. I mean Jews got reparations for surviving being forced to do things for experimental resons that they did not consent you and it's illegal in our country as well, to submit subjects to medical experimentation without their full consent, or to medical processes without informed consent.
Steve Bannon:
As an investigative reporter do you believe with the standards and practices you've guys have used in this investigation with these documents that it reaches to that standard that there's actually questions here and should be pursued further either through some investigation at a grand jury or for further Congressional investigations, but there should be a formal venue more than Daily Clout.IO and the War Room Posse with these lawyers that this can be adjudicated either through investigations at the state level, through state legislatures, congressional, and or even criminal with grand juries?
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
Well, of course I do and it's beautiful that we have 250 lawyers, who are clearly seeing a range of crimes in the evidence that the volunteers have identified, but you're right, it's not enough because this wasn't just one corporation against one individual or one corporation against a class of individuals. It certainly was that, but it's also one corporation in alliance with our own government, right.
The FDA is our agency. They're public servants paid with our tax dollars with a legal obligation to protect us from harm. And so, I've never seen anything like this in the history of our country. It rises to a level I don't even know how to describe of a corporation in league with a government agency and probably kind of up and down the chain of command because otherwise the FDA wouldn't get away with this, uniting to medically experiment on, in a way they know is damaging millions of American people. And corrupt institutions, like doctors’ organizations, licensing boards in order to achieve that. So, that's a level of really a truth and reconciliation committee. It's a level of Nuremberg Trials. It's a higher level than an ordinary court.
Steve Bannon:
I know we have to go through the timeline, but I can't do it today, but I want to, we'll connect with you and see if we can do it tomorrow morning or tomorrow evening because it's too important to rush through. But I have one more question on this before I let you go. When the courts made Pfizer put the information out and you guys are now in the second tranche, the third tranche in May. Did they put a spokesman, or did they put some sort of communications group that you guys can go back and say, hey, we're finding this it looks kind of odd to us. Is there any communication with Pfizer or is any mechanism been set up by the courts so that people reviewing the documents could go and if they were misreading something get an answer or if they found something that was bad that can say, hey look, we need to talk your authorities at Pfizer?
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
Nothing like that has been set up that I see by the courts, but that would be an unusual thing for a court to set up. I think the implication is the public is supposed to do what the public is supposed to do. Meaning that news media is supposed to review these documents and report on it to the public. Congress is supposed to review these documents. The FDA is the entity that's really tasked with being responsive to these documents. So, I can certainly call the FDA comms office. I’ll call Pfizer’s comms office, but I promise you that they won't talk to me in any meaningful way, because there is it's like asking a murderer to send a publicist to talk to people at the scene of the crime. They're not going to do it because this is a massive crime, and you see what they're doing. They're rolling out, now we've got to go after your under-fives. They're boasting about their $102 billion dollars. They're literally not going to take ownership of this crime until they're forced to. And that comes down to us, not just us.
Steven Bannon:
Do you think do you think it rises to that level? Do you think it rises to that level? You actually would be confident and having people sue you right now by saying, I know Bobby Kennedy Jr. does it in the book, ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’. He calls them all criminal organizations and he says he can show where they paid thirty billion dollars in fines and if you go through here, he shows it, he documents it. And by the way, if you want to see how these guys roll, read Anthony Fauci, go get it on Amazon. This book is shocking.
Do you feel that you've got enough now or does that investigative group has enough now that you could feel comfortable, going to local attorney generals or DA's and actually provide this information and that grand juries would be impaneled?
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
Well, to their credit our wonderful are already sending attorney generals letters based on the evidence that these volunteers have uncovered and they're pointing out various causes of action. They’re pointing out that there's false advertising. They're pointing out, as I mentioned, the Liberty Clause and they're pointing out fraud. So that's happening. And I you know, I'm not saying these are criminals and that's me being rhetorical. I'm saying that I know the law about informed consent and you didn't know this, therefore, you didn't have informed consent, right. Yes, I'm certainly confident that and as a mother and a stepmother I feel like I have standing. I feel like every mom and dad and parent in this country has standing because Pfizer knew, like there are a number of crimes right, but Pfizer knew in May that peer-reviewed studies show that their mRNA injection, one week later harmed the hearts of 35 teenagers and the government waited until August to let the parents of Americans know. How is that not a crime?
Steve Bannon:
How to how do people get to the Daily Clout to find out more about this?
Dr. Naomi Wolf:
I will tell you that, I will also note that we have not received any legal letters to date. So, we're on solid ground. Come to Daily Clout.io, join the campaign support us. I'm on Dr. R. Naomi Wolf just keep sending us your thoughts and prayers. And any kind, if you want to volunteer, volunteer help us shine the light.
Steve Bannon:
By the way a great collective effort by the War Room and Daily Clout.
END
(Note to readers: I am not affiliated with Bannon’s War Room. I am merely transcribing so that people could copy and share.)